The prognostic value of the tumor metabolic volume in predicting the response to therapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
- Authors: Vovchenko A.A.1,2, Galitsyna A.B.1,2, Falaleevа N.A.1,2, Khodzhibekova M.M.3, Shuvaev V.A.1,2, Manaenkov D.A.1, Ivanov S.A.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- A.F. Tsyba Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Obninsk Institute of Atomic Energy – branch of the National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
- P.A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Issue: Vol 4, No 4 (2024)
- Pages: 119-128
- Section: DIAGNOSTIC CAPABILITIES
- Published: 16.01.2025
- URL: https://mdonco.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/166
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/2782-3202-2024-4-4-119-128
- ID: 166
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) is an insufficiently studied parameter of positron emission tomography, combined with computer tomography (PET/CT), which has been gaining increasing interest in modern oncology in recent years. It is important to use MTV as a prognostic marker in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
Aim. To analyze the results of therapy in patients with DLBCL and to identify their relationship with MTV, determined by PET/CT data before the start of treatment, after 2 and 6 courses of therapy.
Materials and methods. The prospective study included 80 patients with a morphologically verified diagnosis of DLBCL who were treated at the A.F. Tsyba Medical Radiological Research Center from 2021 to 2024. All patients underwent therapy using R-CHOP regimens (66.25 %) and R-CHOP-like regimens (33.75 %). Each of the patients underwent 3 PET/CT studies with MTV registration – at the staging stage, after 2 and after 6 treatment courses. The median follow-up was 19.5 (4.97–45.53) months. The survival rate was calculated using the Kaplan–Mayer technique, the MTV threshold values were calculated using ROC analysis taking into account the Yuden index.
Results. On the initial PET/CT, the threshold value of MTV was 37.12 cm3 (p = 0.006). In patients with a value above the threshold, failures of classical first-line therapy were statistically significantly more common. The threshold value of MTV in PET/CT after 2 courses of treatment was 19.15 cm3 (p = 0.032), in PET/CT after 6 courses – 8.73 cm3 (p = 0.028). In patients with an MTV value above the threshold, according to the results of PET/CT performed after the 2nd and 6th courses, cases of disease progression were also statistically significantly more frequent.
Conclusion. MTV is a new prognostic factor in modern oncological practice and should be evaluated in all patients with DLBCL and taken into account when making decisions regarding therapy tactics.
About the authors
A. A. Vovchenko
A.F. Tsyba Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia; Obninsk Institute of Atomic Energy – branch of the National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Author for correspondence.
Email: dr.vovchenkoartem@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-6911-3322
Artem Andreevich Vovchenko
4 Koroleva St., Obninsk, 249031
1 Studgorodok Territory, Obninsk, 249039
Russian FederationA. B. Galitsyna
A.F. Tsyba Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia; Obninsk Institute of Atomic Energy – branch of the National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-0188-8420
4 Koroleva St., Obninsk, 249031
1 Studgorodok Territory, Obninsk, 249039
Russian FederationN. A. Falaleevа
A.F. Tsyba Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia; Obninsk Institute of Atomic Energy – branch of the National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0023-4216
4 Koroleva St., Obninsk, 249031
1 Studgorodok Territory, Obninsk, 249039
Russian FederationM. M. Khodzhibekova
P.A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia
3 2ndBotkinskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125284
Russian FederationV. A. Shuvaev
A.F. Tsyba Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia; Obninsk Institute of Atomic Energy – branch of the National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3536-0770
4 Koroleva St., Obninsk, 249031
1 Studgorodok Territory, Obninsk, 249039
Russian FederationD. A. Manaenkov
A.F. Tsyba Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-9269-7405
4 Koroleva St., Obninsk, 249031
Russian FederationS. A. Ivanov
A.F. Tsyba Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia; Obninsk Institute of Atomic Energy – branch of the National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7689-6032
4 Koroleva St., Obninsk, 249031
1 Studgorodok Territory, Obninsk, 249039
Russian FederationReferences
Supplementary files

