Omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer: ongoing trial at the P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard of regional staging in early-stage breast cancer (BC). However, contemporary randomized trials (SOUND, INSEMA, NAUTILUS) demonstrate the feasibility of safe axillary surgical de-escalation in a defined subset of patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) disease. Given the low rate of axillary lymph node metastases and the limited sensitivity of SLNB, this procedure may represent overtreatment in a proportion of patients.

Aim. To evaluate the oncological safety and clinical impact of SLNB omission in patients with early-stage breast cancer and clinically intact axillary lymph nodes, and to define approaches to adjuvant therapy optimization in this cohort.

Materials and methods. A prospective randomized non-inferiority trial is being conducted at the P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute. Patients with early-stage BC (cTis–cT2, cN0) were randomized 1:1 to SLNB or SLNB omission. In patients with cT1c–T2 disease, intraoperative fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the sentinel lymph node was additionally performed using a fan-shaped technique. The primary endpoint is disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, locoregional and axillary recurrence rates, and quality-of-life characteristics.

Results. The preliminary analysis included 151 patients. In the cT1a–b cohort assigned to SLNB omission, no lymph node metastases were identified. In the SLNB control group, metastases were detected in 12.5 % of patients, with involvement limited to no more than one lymph node in all cases. In the cT1c–T2 cohort, the metastatic involvement rate was 16.5 %. Intraoperative fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the sentinel lymph node demonstrated a sensitivity of 57.1 %, specificity of 100 %, positive predictive value of 100 %, and negative predictive value of 92.8 %. Favorable biological subtypes (luminal tumors) and low-to-intermediate histological grades predominated in the study population.

Conclusion. Preliminary findings suggest potential oncological safety of SLNB omission in carefully selected patients with early-stage breast cancer and cN0 status. Rigorous preoperative axillary assessment using imaging modalities is a prerequisite. Further patient recruitment and extended follow-up are required to enable definitive evaluation of long-term oncological outcomes and to refine criteria for axillary surgical de-escalation.

About the authors

D. S. Dzhabrailova

P.A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: dr_dzhabrailova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7283-2530
Russian Federation, 3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125284

D. B. Kodzoeva

P.A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: dr_dzhabrailova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-4257-3530
Russian Federation, 3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125284

A. D. Zikiryakhodzhaev

P.A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia; RUDN University; Institute of Professional Education, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)

Email: dr_dzhabrailova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7141-2502
Russian Federation, 3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125284; 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198; Build. 2, 8 Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119048

K. V. Maksimov

P.A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: dr_dzhabrailova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8783-9738
Russian Federation, 3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125284

F. N. Usov

Clinical Hospital "Lapino" of the "Mother and Child" Group of Companies

Email: dr_dzhabrailova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9510-1434
Russian Federation, 111 1st Uspenskoe Shosse, Lapino, Moscow Region, 143081

E. A. Lisitsina

P.A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: dr_dzhabrailova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0870-4857
Russian Federation, 3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125284

F. S. Khugaeva

P.A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: dr_dzhabrailova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9749-0445
Russian Federation, 3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125284

N. N. Volchenko

P.A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: dr_dzhabrailova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4873-4455
Russian Federation, 3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125284

References

  1. Rovera F., Frattini F., Marelli M. et al. Axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy: an overview. Int J Surg 2008;6(Suppl 1):S109–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.12.008
  2. Lucocq J., Baig H., Elder K. et al. Feasibility of the omission of axillary surgery in node-negative early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast 2025;83:104559. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104559
  3. Gentilini O.D., Botteri E., Sangalli C. et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy vs no axillary surgery in patients with small breast cancer and negative results on ultrasonography of axillary lymph nodes. JAMA Oncol 2023;9(11):1557–64. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3759
  4. Pesek S., Ashikaga T., Krag L.E., Krag D. The false-negative rate of sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg 2012;36(9):2239–51. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1623-z
  5. Wanis K.N., Mitchell M.P., Giordano S.H. et al. Implications of omitting sentinel lymph node biopsy on adjuvant decision making for patients with small breast cancers. Cancer 2025;131(11):e35910. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35910.
  6. Verbelen H., Tjalma W., Meirte J., Gebruers N. Long-term morbidity after a negative sentinel node in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019;28(5). doi: 10.1111/ecc.13077
  7. Giuliano A.E., Ballman K.V., McCall L. et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: the ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;318(10):918–26. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11470
  8. Reimer T., Stachs A., Veselinovic K. et al. Axillary surgery in breast cancer – primary results of the INSEMA trial. N Engl J Med 2025;392(11):1051–64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2412063
  9. Barco I., García A., Vallejo E. et al. Can intraoperative sentinel node fine-needle aspiration biopsy replace sentinel node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery? Clin Transl Oncol 2025;27(12):4426–9. doi: 10.1007/s12094-025-03961-7
  10. Donker M., van Tienhoven G., Straver M.E. et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981–22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15(12):1303–10. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70460-7
  11. DiSipio T., Rye S., Newman B., Hayes S.C. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2013;14(6):500–15. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70076-7
  12. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Breast cancer (version 5.2025). 2025. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf (accessed November 10, 2025)
  13. Duan C., Du J., Zhu L. et al. The DCIS-IBC guide board on predicting postoperative upgrading in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: clinical insights from a multicenter study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2025;213(1):101–14. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07763-x
  14. Miceli R., Gao Y., Qian K., Heller S.L. Predicting upgrade of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer at surgery with ultrafast imaging. Am J Roentgenol 2023;221(1):34–43. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.28698
  15. Podoll M.B., Reisenbichler E.S., Roland L. et al. Feasibility of the less is more approach in treating low–risk ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed on core needle biopsy: ten-year review of ductal carcinoma in situ upgraded to invasion at surgery. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018;142(9):1120–6. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0268-OA
  16. Park K.U., Somerfield M.R., Anne N. et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2025;43(14):1720–41. doi: 10.1200/JCO-25-00099
  17. Sparano J.A., Gray R.J., Makower D.F. et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379(2):111–21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804710
  18. Kalinsky K., Barlow W.E., Gralow J.R. et al. 21-gene assay to inform chemotherapy benefit in node-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2021;385(25):2336–47. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108873

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2026 ABV-Press

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-81466 от  03.08.2021.